Faculty profile
Clayton Pettit
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Alberta directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $34,000
Towards a Rational Design Methodology of Partially-Grouted Masonry Shear Walls for Improved Resilience and Multi-Hazard Mitigation
NSERC · 2024 · Principal investigator
- $150,000
Evaluation of the Structural and Thermal Performance of Masonry Veneer Shelf Angle Connections for Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Building Design
NSERC · 2024 · Principal investigator
- $12,500
Towards a Rational Design Methodology of Partially-Grouted Masonry Shear Walls for Improved Resilience and Multi-Hazard Mitigation
NSERC · 2024 · Principal investigator
Towards a Rational Design Methodology of Partially-Grouted Masonry Shear Walls for Improved Resilience and Multi-Hazard Mitigation
Principal investigators: Pettit, Clayton
Keywords: masonry walls; partially-grouted; in-plane shear; seismic loading; full-scale experimental testing; finite element micro-modelling; walls with openings; design provision improvement; strut-and-tie model; hybrid simulation
Evaluation of the Structural and Thermal Performance of Masonry Veneer Shelf Angle Connections for Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Building Design
Principal investigators: Pettit, Clayton
Keywords: Engineering; Structural engineering
Towards a Rational Design Methodology of Partially-Grouted Masonry Shear Walls for Improved Resilience and Multi-Hazard Mitigation
Principal investigators: Pettit, Clayton
Keywords: masonry walls; partially-grouted; in-plane shear; seismic loading; full-scale experimental testing; finite element micro-modelling; walls with openings; design provision improvement; strut-and-tie model; hybrid simulation
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.