This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a University of Alberta directory, so their courses may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest papers
Practices of looking and the medical humanities: imagining the unborn in France, 1550-1800.
The Journal of medical humanities · 2010 · first author
Latest funding
- $54,977
Unsettling pioneer museums in Alberta
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $154,272
Unsettling pioneer museums in Alberta
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $103,239
Enterprising amateurs: place, identity, and economy in non-professional museums
SSHRC · 2014 · Principal investigator
1 publications.
Practices of looking and the medical humanities: imagining the unborn in France, 1550-1800.
McTavish L
Unsettling pioneer museums in Alberta
Principal investigators: McTavish, Lianne M.
Keywords: pioneer museums; critical museum studies; art history; material culture studies; colonial settler studies; decolonization
Unsettling pioneer museums in Alberta
Principal investigators: McTavish, Lianne M.
Keywords: pioneer museums; critical museum studies; art history; material culture studies; colonial settler studies; decolonization
Enterprising amateurs: place, identity, and economy in non-professional museums
Principal investigators: McTavish, Lianne M.
Keywords: museums; museum policy; identity; cultural exchange; economic benefits and challenges; gender; Alberta; comparative methodology; definitions of professionalism; rural and remote communities
Recovering bodies in early modern France: images of convalescence and cure, 1600-1800
Principal investigators: McTavish, Lianne M.
Keywords: history of the body; history of art; history of medicine; images of healing; gender and illness; early modern France; New France; popular traditions; academic art practices
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.