This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Alberta directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $199,220
Pathways to the premiership: representation, motivation and impact of women premiers in Canada and Australia
SSHRC · 2016 · Principal investigator
- $94,882
Gendered mediation of Canadian national political party leadership candidates, 1975-2006
SSHRC · 2010 · Principal investigator
- $69,813
The Influence of power and gender in newspaper evaluations of female first ministers in Australia, Canada and New Zealand: 1989-2005
SSHRC · 2005 · Principal investigator
Pathways to the premiership: representation, motivation and impact of women premiers in Canada and Australia
Principal investigators: Trimble, Linda J.
Keywords: women premiers; women and leadership; Canada; Australia; party and electoral politics; political representation; career paths; federalism; parliamentary systems; media coverage; comparative analysis; mixed methods; personal interviews
Gendered mediation of Canadian national political party leadership candidates, 1975-2006
Principal investigators: Trimble, Linda J.
Keywords: gendered mediation; women; mass media; political communication; leadership; Canadian politics; political parties; party leadership selection
The Influence of power and gender in newspaper evaluations of female first ministers in Australia, Canada and New Zealand: 1989-2005
Principal investigators: Trimble, Linda J.
Keywords: women and politics; media and politics; gender and political leadership; media coverage of women politicians
Elire des femmes en politique : quels changements d'hier à demain?
Principal investigators: Tremblay, Manon
Keywords: Femmes politiques; féministes; représentation politique; Canada
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.