Faculty profile
Barbara Bordalejo
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Lethbridge directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $79,536
Resistance to Data: Understanding Data Use, Data Management, and Data Infrastructure in the "Traditional" Humanities through Historical, Comparative, and Ethnographic Study
SSHRC · 2025 · Co-investigator
- $147,000
Canterbury Tales Project Phase 3: Analysis and Publication
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $147,000
Canterbury Tales Project Phase 3: Analysis and Publication
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
Resistance to Data: Understanding Data Use, Data Management, and Data Infrastructure in the "Traditional" Humanities through Historical, Comparative, and Ethnographic Study
Principal investigators: O'Donnell, Daniel P.
Keywords: Research Data Management; Humanities Research Practices; Research Data Infrastructure; History of Science; Science and Technology Studies; Scholarly Communication; Digital Humanities; Information Science
Canterbury Tales Project Phase 3: Analysis and Publication
Principal investigators: Bordalejo, Barbara
Keywords: Canterbury Tales; Chaucer; textual scholarship; scholarly editing; stemmatology; FAIR data
Canterbury Tales Project Phase 3: Analysis and Publication
Principal investigators: Bordalejo, Barbara
Keywords: Canterbury Tales; Chaucer; textual scholarship; scholarly editing; stemmatology; FAIR data
Good things come in small packages: A grassroots Community of Practice for Open and FAIR humanities data practices
Principal investigators: O'Donnell, Daniel P.
Keywords: research data management; open access; humanities; fair data; care data; cultural heritage; communities of practice; scholarly communication; archives; repositories
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.