This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Simon Fraser University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $57,800
Learning to Be a Thinking Thing
SSHRC · 2019 · Principal investigator
- $199,800
New narratives in the history of philosophy
SSHRC · 2014 · Principal investigator
- $45,900
Emotions and sense perception in 17th and 18th century philosophy
SSHRC · 2009 · Principal investigator
Learning to Be a Thinking Thing
Principal investigators: Shapiro, Lisa C.
Keywords: early modern philosophy; women philosophers; education; rationality; habituation; emotions; political institutions; autonomy; Descartes; Madame de Maintenon; Poulain de la Barre; Gabrielle Suchon; Mary Astell
New narratives in the history of philosophy
Principal investigators: Shapiro, Lisa C.
Keywords: philosophy; history of philosophy; early modern philosophy; intellectual history; metaphysics; epistemology; education; autonomy; women; curricular innovation
Emotions and sense perception in 17th and 18th century philosophy
Principal investigators: Shapiro, Lisa C.
Keywords: emotion; sense perception; epistemology; object perception; philosophical psychology; early modern philosophy; David Hume; George Berkeley; Frances Hutcheson; Etienne Bonnot de Condillac; Rene Descartes; Baruch Spinoza
Emotions and cognition in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy
Principal investigators: Shapiro, Lisa C.
Keywords: emotion; cognition; early modern philosophy; medieval philosophy; history of cognitive science; philosophy of mind
The passions and the problem of human nature in Descartes
Principal investigators: Shapiro, Lisa C.
Keywords: early modern philosophy; Descartes; human nature; metaphysics; causation; philosophy of mind; emotions; perception; mind-body problem
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.