This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of British Columbia directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $173,469
Mentoring as a professional practice: addressing an intractable problem in teacher education
SSHRC · 2017 · Principal investigator
- $131,740
Professional learning communities: a multicase study in three countries
SSHRC · 2007 · Co-investigator
- $129,956
A cooperating teacher network: challenging assumptions and relocating responsibilities
SSHRC · 2006 · Principal investigator
Mentoring as a professional practice: addressing an intractable problem in teacher education
Principal investigators: Clarke, Anthony
Keywords: teacher education; the practicum; mentoring; supervision; practitioner inquiry; specialized knowledge base
Professional learning communities: a multicase study in three countries
Principal investigators: Erickson, Gaalen L.
Keywords: teacher professional development; collabortive inquiry; teacher and student learning; technology and teacher education; cross-cultural pedagogical practices; practitioner research; learning in informal settings; theory of practice
A cooperating teacher network: challenging assumptions and relocating responsibilities
Principal investigators: Clarke, Anthony
Keywords: cooperating teachers; student teachers; practicum; teacher education; professional development; learning networks; complexity science
The pedagogy of school-based teacher educators
Principal investigators: Clarke, Anthony
Keywords: School advisor pedagogy; supervision of teaching; learning to teach in field settings
The Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network (CBDN)
Principal investigators: Hancock, Robert
Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network (CBDN)
Principal investigators: Hancock, Robert
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.