This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of British Columbia directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $22,600
Connecting international and Canadian scholars, teachers, and community educators to address digital equity: access, ethics and engagement in digital language and literacy research and practice
SSHRC · 2015 · Principal investigator
- $114,570
Young children's engagement with digital tools and technology at home and in the community
SSHRC · 2014 · Principal investigator
- $20,584
The intersection of language, learning and culture in early childhood: Home, school and community contexts
SSHRC · 2011 · Principal investigator
Connecting international and Canadian scholars, teachers, and community educators to address digital equity: access, ethics and engagement in digital language and literacy research and practice
Principal investigators: Anderson, Jim
Keywords: digital literacies; education; literacy; equity in education; digital access; digital engagement; digital ethics; youth; children; adults; community engagement; learning in communities; digital literacies in schools
Young children's engagement with digital tools and technology at home and in the community
Principal investigators: Anderson, Jim
Keywords: early childhood; digital literacy; families; communities; ecological perspective
The intersection of language, learning and culture in early childhood: Home, school and community contexts
Principal investigators: Anderson, Jim
Keywords: early childhood education; culture; language; literacy; families; community; school
Critical Issues in Family/Community Literacy
Principal investigators: Anderson, Jim
Keywords: family literacy; community literacy; adult literacy; adolescent literacy; workplace literacy
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.