Faculty profile
Jonathan Woodend
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Victoria directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $33,186
Nudges, Shoves, and Selling Systemic Policy Solutions
SSHRC · 2024 · Co-investigator
- $28,133
Largely Invisible: Understanding the Complexities of Weight Stigma in Career Development
SSHRC · 2024 · Co-investigator
- $74,960
Making a Calculated Risk: Influences on International Students and Accompanying Partners' Career Decision-Making Process to Study in Canada
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
Nudges, Shoves, and Selling Systemic Policy Solutions
Principal investigators: McFerran, Brent
Keywords: marketing; consumer behaviour; nudging; inequality; attribution; person perception; morality; ethics
Largely Invisible: Understanding the Complexities of Weight Stigma in Career Development
Principal investigators: Russell-Mayhew, Michelle (Shelly) K.
Keywords: weight stigma; career development; intersectionality; equity; workplace; discrimination;
Making a Calculated Risk: Influences on International Students and Accompanying Partners' Career Decision-Making Process to Study in Canada
Principal investigators: Woodend, Jonathan
Keywords: International students; Accompanying partners; International career transition; Systems theory framework; Career development; Post-secondary education
Associations prospectives entre le soutien paternel à l'autonomie et le développement cognitif et socioaffectif de l'enfant à l'âge préscolaire
Principal investigators: Laflamme, Emma
Keywords: soutien à l'autonomie; relation père-enfant; développement cognitif; développement socioaffectif; développement de l'enfant; antécédents; comportements parentaux; interaction parent-enfant
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.