Faculty profile
Janice Best
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Acadia University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $78,250
Playing Napoleon: The battlefield on the boulevard
SSHRC · 2019 · Principal investigator
- $4,005
Playing Napoleon: The battlefield on the boulevard
SSHRC · 2019 · Principal investigator
- $83,952
Secrets and scandals: political censorship of Vaudeville theatre in 19th century France
SSHRC · 2013 · Principal investigator
Playing Napoleon: The battlefield on the boulevard
Principal investigators: Best, Janice J.
Keywords: censorship; propaganda; popular theatre; Napoléon I; Napoléon III; myths of national identity; dialogism; dominant discourse; counter discourse
Playing Napoleon: The battlefield on the boulevard
Principal investigators: Best, Janice J.
Keywords: censorship; propaganda; popular theatre; Napoléon I; Napoléon III; myths of national identity; dialogism; dominant discourse; counter discourse
Secrets and scandals: political censorship of Vaudeville theatre in 19th century France
Principal investigators: Best, Janice J.
Keywords: political censorship; nineteenth-century French literature; Vaudeville theatre; discourse analysis; dialogism; Bakhtin; speech act theory; dominant discourse; counter discourse; parody; popular music; database of censored manuscripts
Rebuilding Paris after 1870: public space, history and forgetting
Principal investigators: Best, Janice J.
Keywords: public space; history; fine art; literature; censorship; dialogism; discouse analysis; ideology
Moralité, politique et dialogisme : la censure théâtrale au XIXe siècle
Principal investigators: Best, Janice
Keywords: Censure; autocensure; dialogisme; moralité; politique; subversion; théâtre; opéra
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.