Faculty profile
Olessia Jouravlev
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a Carleton University directory, so their courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest papers
Three distinct components of pragmatic language use: Social conventions, intonation, and world knowledge-based causal reasoning.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
Latest funding
- $273,310
Programming and Language: What is the connection?
SSHRC · 2018 · Principal investigator
- $168,000
Exploring individual differences in language processing using behavioral and electrophysiological methods
NSERC · 2018 · Principal investigator
- $12,500
Exploring individual differences in language processing using behavioral and electrophysiological methods
NSERC · 2018 · Principal investigator
10 publications.
Three distinct components of pragmatic language use: Social conventions, intonation, and world knowledge-based causal reasoning.
Floyd S, Jouravlev O, Poliak M, Mineroff Z, Gibson E, Fedorenko E
Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.
Malik-Moraleda S, Jouravlev O, Taliaferro M, Mineroff Z, Cucu T, Mahowald K, Blank IA, Fedorenko E
Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.
Malik-Moraleda S, Jouravlev O, Taliaferro M, Mineroff Z, Cucu T, Mahowald K, Blank IA, Fedorenko E
The human language system, including its inferior frontal component in "Broca's area," does not support music perception.
Chen X, Affourtit J, Ryskin R, Regev TI, Norman-Haignere S, Jouravlev O, Malik-Moraleda S, Kean H, Varley R, Fedorenko E
Probabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals.
Lipkin B, Tuckute G, Affourtit J, Small H, Mineroff Z, Kean H, Jouravlev O, Rakocevic L, Pritchett B, Siegelman M, Hoeflin C, Pongos A, Blank IA, Struhl MK, Ivanova A, Shannon S, Sathe A, Hoffmann M, Nieto-Castañón A, Fedorenko E
An investigation across 45 languages and 12 language families reveals a universal language network.
Malik-Moraleda S, Ayyash D, Gallée J, Affourtit J, Hoffmann M, Mineroff Z, Jouravlev O, Fedorenko E
Differential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.
Paunov AM, Blank IA, Jouravlev O, Mineroff Z, Gallée J, Fedorenko E
The Small and Efficient Language Network of Polyglots and Hyper-polyglots.
Jouravlev O, Mineroff Z, Blank IA, Fedorenko E
Reduced Language Lateralization in Autism and the Broader Autism Phenotype as Assessed with Robust Individual-Subjects Analyses.
Jouravlev O, Kell AJE, Mineroff Z, Haskins AJ, Ayyash D, Kanwisher N, Fedorenko E
Speech-accompanying gestures are not processed by the language-processing mechanisms.
Jouravlev O, Zheng D, Balewski Z, Le Arnz Pongos A, Levan Z, Goldin-Meadow S, Fedorenko E
Programming and Language: What is the connection?
Principal investigators: Jouravlev, Olessia
Keywords: language; computer programming; individual differences;computational thinking; ERPs; fNIRS
Exploring individual differences in language processing using behavioral and electrophysiological methods
Principal investigators: Jouravlev, Olessia
Keywords: autism; bilingualism; ERPs; eye-tracking; individual differences; language comprehension
Exploring individual differences in language processing using behavioral and electrophysiological methods
Principal investigators: Jouravlev, Olessia
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.