This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Ontario Tech University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $93,721
Overconfidence and Epistemic Miscalibration: Investigating Factors that Limit Diverse Perspective Seeking and Decision Quality
SSHRC · 2026 · Principal investigator
- $222,277
Breaking barriers: Using experiential learning to foster empathy and reduce stigma toward wrongfully convicted and other formerly incarcerated individuals
SSHRC · 2025 · Principal investigator
- $73,373
After innocence: identifying factors that reduce stigma toward exonerees
SSHRC · 2018 · Principal investigator
Overconfidence and Epistemic Miscalibration: Investigating Factors that Limit Diverse Perspective Seeking and Decision Quality
Principal investigators: Clow, Kimberley
Breaking barriers: Using experiential learning to foster empathy and reduce stigma toward wrongfully convicted and other formerly incarcerated individuals
Principal investigators: Clow, Kimberley A.
After innocence: identifying factors that reduce stigma toward exonerees
Principal investigators: Clow, Kimberley A.
Keywords: stigma reduction; wrongful conviction
The role of personal factors, penal experiences, community support and positive case management in former federal prisoners pathway to desistance or recidivism: The decision to "make good" or remain criminally active
Principal investigators: Ricciardelli, Rosemary
Keywords: Desistance; Recidivism; Former Federal Prisoners; Case Management; Incarceration; Punishment and Society; Reintegration; Community Corrections; Rehabilitation; Corrections
Confidence in the Canadian criminal justice system wrongful conviction and forms of redress
Principal investigators: Clow, Kimberley A.
Keywords: wrongful conviction; public perception; stigma; justice
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.