This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Ontario Tech University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $183,600
The systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical heart failure trials by intersectionality of sex and gender, race, and age: Maximizing knowledge translation opportunities
CIHR · 2025 · Principal investigator
- $19,827
Planning for the evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical trials by sex, race, and age
CIHR · 2024 · Co-investigator
- $100,000
The systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical trials by sex, race, and age: Maximizing knowledge translation opportunities
CIHR · 2024 · Principal investigator
The systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical heart failure trials by intersectionality of sex and gender, race, and age: Maximizing knowledge translation opportunities
Principal investigators: Banks, Laura J; Colella, Tracey J
Keywords: Age; Cardiovascular Outcomes; Heart Failure; Intersectionality; Knowledge Translation; Race; Sex And Gender; Systematic Review
Planning for the evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical trials by sex, race, and age
Principal investigators: Banks, Laura J; Randhawa, Varinder K
Keywords: Age; Cardiovascular Disease; Cardiovascular Outcomes; Environmental Scan; Heart Failure; Knowledge Synthesis; Race; Sex
The systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes in major clinical trials by sex, race, and age: Maximizing knowledge translation opportunities
Principal investigators: Banks, Laura J; Colella, Tracey J
Keywords: Age; Cardiovascular Disease; Cardiovascular Outcomes; Heart Failure; Knowledge Translation; Race; Sex And Gender; Systematic Review
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.