This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Queen's University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $58,445
Fictive Flesh: Painted sculpture in the Italian Renaissance
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $23,672
Fictive Flesh: Painted sculpture in the Italian Renaissance
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $50,947
Statues that Blush and Bleed: Painted Sculpture in Northern and Southern Italy in the Sixteenth Century
SSHRC · 2019 · Principal investigator
Fictive Flesh: Painted sculpture in the Italian Renaissance
Principal investigators: D'Elia, Una R.
Keywords: sculpture; Renaissance; polychrome; effigy; devotion; colour; literature; geography; idolatry
Fictive Flesh: Painted sculpture in the Italian Renaissance
Principal investigators: D'Elia, Una R.
Keywords: sculpture; Renaissance; polychrome; effigy; devotion; colour; literature; geography; idolatry
Statues that Blush and Bleed: Painted Sculpture in Northern and Southern Italy in the Sixteenth Century
Principal investigators: D'Elia, Una
Keywords: (1) sculpture; (2) colour; (3) devotion; (4) cult; (5) Renaissance; (6) polychrome; (7) Italy; (8) Spain; (9) Counter-Reformation
Sculpture and color in fifteenth-century Tuscany
Principal investigators: D'Elia, Una R.
Keywords: color; sculpture; polychrome; Renaissance; Florence; siena; terracotta; wood; Donatello; Luca della Robbia; Andrea del Verrocchio; Jacopo della Quercia; devotion; annunciation; crucifixion; Madonna; portraits; effigies
Allegory and ambiguity in 16th-century Italian art
Principal investigators: D'Elia, Una R.
Keywords: Renaissance; allegory; mannerism; painting; sculpture; printmaking; hermeticism; ambiguity; hermeneutics; Raphael; Giorgio Vasari; counter reformation; Anton Francesco Doni
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.