This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Guelph directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $78,300
In the shadows of climate change mitigation: The politics of extraction for a just energy transition
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $149,120
In the shadows of climate change mitigation: The politics of extraction for a just energy transition
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $67,242
Forest conservation, Indigenous self-determination and climate change: An empirical analysis of Ecuador's Socio Bosque program
SSHRC · 2018 · Principal investigator
In the shadows of climate change mitigation: The politics of extraction for a just energy transition
Principal investigators: Johnson, Craig A.
Keywords: resources; environmental politics; comparative politics; political economy; environmental governance; extractive industries; renewable energy; climate change
In the shadows of climate change mitigation: The politics of extraction for a just energy transition
Principal investigators: Johnson, Craig A.
Keywords: resources; environmental politics; comparative politics; political economy; environmental governance; extractive industries; renewable energy; climate change
Forest conservation, Indigenous self-determination and climate change: An empirical analysis of Ecuador's Socio Bosque program
Principal investigators: Johnson, Craig
Keywords: (1) Indigenous politics; (2) Forest conservation; (3) Livelihoods and wellbeing; (4) Rights of nature; (5) Environmental governance; (6) Climate change
Explaining religious tolerance in India: decentralization, accommodation and the secular state
Principal investigators: Johnson, Craig A.
Keywords: religion; religious violence; decentralization; democracy; India
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.