Faculty profile
Andreas Veneris
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Toronto directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $140,000
Automated Smart Contract Synthesis and Verification for Distributed Ledger Blockchain Technology
NSERC · 2019 · Principal investigator
- $12,500
Multimodal Representation Learning for Retail Product Ontology
NSERC · 2018 · Principal investigator
- $25,000
Multimodal representation learning for retail product ontology
NSERC · 2017 · Principal investigator
Automated Smart Contract Synthesis and Verification for Distributed Ledger Blockchain Technology
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Keywords: blockchain; CAD tools and methodologies; debugging; distributed ledger technology; formal methods; smart contract software; verification
Multimodal Representation Learning for Retail Product Ontology
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Multimodal representation learning for retail product ontology
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Theory and Methodology for Performance-Driven Automation in RTL and Testbench Debugging
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Low power design using power gating
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Low power design and verification
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
FPGA Functional Debug and Verification
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Performance-driven SAT- and QBF-based solutions for a modern VLSI verification, debugging and test environment
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Logic debugging using boolean satisfiability in high performance digital VLSI designs
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
Logic verification using diagnosis techniques
Principal investigators: Veneris, Andreas
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.