Faculty profile
David Steinman
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Toronto directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $53,000
MULTI: Modelling the Uncanny valley between Laminar and Turbulent blood flow dynamIcs
NSERC · 2024 · Principal investigator
- $860,626
Dissecting the role of hemodynamics in ascending aorta aneurysm development
CIHR · 2019 · Co-investigator
- $384,000
Making sense of highly-disturbed blood flow dynamics
NSERC · 2018 · Principal investigator
MULTI: Modelling the Uncanny valley between Laminar and Turbulent blood flow dynamIcs
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Keywords: transitional flow; flow-induced vibration; acoustic modelling; cerebral aneurysm; pulsatile tinnitus; flow visualization; data sonification; art-science collaborations; human-computer interaction
Dissecting the role of hemodynamics in ascending aorta aneurysm development
Principal investigators: Simmons, Craig A
Keywords: Aortic Aneurysm; C-Type Natriuretic Peptide; Echocardiography; Fluid Dynamics; Hemodynamics; Proteomics; Shear Stress
Making sense of highly-disturbed blood flow dynamics
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Phase I: interactive ultrasound simulator for sonographer training and accreditation
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Market assessment: interactive ultrasound simulator for sonographer training and accreditation
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Virtual Imaging and Visualization of Blood Flow Dynamics
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Virtual medical imaging
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
Virtual doppler ultrasound: interactive and real-time visualisation of computational hemodynamics data
Principal investigators: Steinman, David
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.