This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Toronto directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $75,000
Innovations in Genetic Services: A Systematic Review of Alternative Delivery Models
CIHR · 2025 · Principal investigator
- $734,400
Toward equity in cancer genetics: identifying racial disparities in cancer genetics services
CIHR · 2022 · Co-investigator
- $1,147,500
Uncovering the mechanism and impact of novel genetic and epigenetic promoter alterations on tissue-specific mismatch repair deficient cancers
CIHR · 2022 · Co-investigator
Innovations in Genetic Services: A Systematic Review of Alternative Delivery Models
Principal investigators: Bombard, Yvonne; Etchegary, Holly; Schrader, Kasmintan A
Keywords: Allied Health Professionals; Genetic Services; Knowledge Sharing & Mobilization; Mixed Methods; Realist Review; Systematic Review
Toward equity in cancer genetics: identifying racial disparities in cancer genetics services
Principal investigators: Bombard, Yvonne
Keywords: Chart Review; Equity; Genetics Health Services; Health Disparities; Healthcare Access; Racialized Communities
Uncovering the mechanism and impact of novel genetic and epigenetic promoter alterations on tissue-specific mismatch repair deficient cancers
Principal investigators: Tabori, Uri
Keywords: Cancer Predisposition; Colon Cancers; Glioma; Hypermutation; Mismatch Repair Deficiency; Promoter Hypermethylation; Promoter Mutation
Variations in care for hereditary cancer syndrome families: direct and indirect socio-economic impacts
Principal investigators: Bombard, Yvonne; Sun, Sophie; Etchegary, Holly; Schrader, Kasmintan A
Keywords: Genetic Testing; Genomic Sequencing; Hereditary Cancer; Indirect Impacts Of Disease
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.