Faculty profile
MARLENE KOFFI
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Toronto directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $109,271
THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC PATENTING ON FACULTY CAREER TRAJECTORIES
SSHRC · 2025 · Principal investigator
- $20,559
Predicting Teachers' effectiveness: A Machine Learning Approach
SSHRC · 2022 · Principal investigator
- $40,312
Predicting Teachers' effectiveness: A Machine Learning Approach
SSHRC · 2022 · Principal investigator
THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC PATENTING ON FACULTY CAREER TRAJECTORIES
Principal investigators: Koffi, Marlène
Predicting Teachers' effectiveness: A Machine Learning Approach
Principal investigators: KOFFI, MARLENE
Keywords: Teacher effectiveness; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Big Data; Experiments
Predicting Teachers' effectiveness: A Machine Learning Approach
Principal investigators: KOFFI, MARLENE
Keywords: Teacher effectiveness; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Big Data; Experiments
Intelligent machines and human worker inequities: Examining the implications of artificial intelligence in the workplace
Principal investigators: Jetha, Arif
Keywords: artificial intelligence; worker inequity; work environment; machine learning; labour market policy; workforce development programs; vulnerable workers; future of work; digital transformation of the economy
Intelligent machines and human worker inequities: Examining the implications of artificial intelligence in the workplace
Principal investigators: Jetha, Arif
Keywords: artificial intelligence; worker inequity; work environment; machine learning; labour market policy; workforce development programs; vulnerable workers; future of work; digital transformation of the economy
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.