This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a University of Windsor directory, so their courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest papers
Annotating Argument Schemes.
Argumentation · 2021 · senior author
The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
Science and engineering ethics · 2017 · first author
Latest funding
- $315,246
The Carneades argumentation system
SSHRC · 2012 · Principal investigator
- $98,400
Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
SSHRC · 2008 · Principal investigator
2 publications.
Annotating Argument Schemes.
Visser J, Lawrence J, Reed C, Wagemans J, Walton D
The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
Walton D
The Carneades argumentation system
Principal investigators: Walton, Douglas N.
Keywords: argumentation; artificial intelligence; legal argumentation; argument mapping
Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Principal investigators: Walton, Douglas N.
Keywords: argumentation; legal reasoning; artificial intelligence; informal logic; multi-agent argumentation
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.