This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Concordia University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $41,028
Heroes in Contemporary Popular Culture: Figures, Forms, and Functions
SSHRC · 2024 · Principal investigator
- $10,992
Revelation Rebooted: The Commentary Tradition on the Revelation of John
SSHRC · 2022 · Principal investigator
- $253,473
The Mediaeval antichrist tradition: texts and contexts
SSHRC · 2018 · Principal investigator
Heroes in Contemporary Popular Culture: Figures, Forms, and Functions
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: heroes/heroines; women; gender; indigenous; african-american; antiheroes
Revelation Rebooted: The Commentary Tradition on the Revelation of John
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: Revelation; commentary; prediction; reception; interpreration; apocalyptic
The Mediaeval antichrist tradition: texts and contexts
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: apocalypse; antichrist; Christianity; Judaism; Islam; late antiquity; eschatologymiddle ages
Fifth Enoch Graduate Seminar
Principal investigators: Oegema, Gerbern S.
Keywords: early Judaism; early Christianity; Greco-Roman antiquity; religion
The post-classical sibylline tradition
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: sibylline; apocalyptic; apocrypha; prophecy; oracles; Judaism; Christianity; antiquity; mediaeval
History and apocalypse
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: apocalyptic; history; end of the world; ideologies; history of ideas
Daniel and the mediaeval apocalyptic tradition
Principal investigators: DiTommaso, Lorenzo
Keywords: apocalyptic literature; eschatology; bible and biblical apocrypha; pseudepigrapha; oppression literature
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.