This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a Concordia University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $104,729
A Systematic Review of K12 Teachers' Use of Generative AI Tools, a Survey of Canadian Teacher Education Programs' Treatment of the Topic, and the Relationship of Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Pre-service Education and In-service Practice
SSHRC · 2025 · Co-investigator
- $63,181
A Systematic Review of Online Learning and its Variants as Related to Self-Efficacy, Achievement and Attitudes in Pre- and In-service Teacher Education
SSHRC · 2024 · Principal investigator
- $52,208
Social isolation in remote learning contexts among post-secondary students: Using systematic review to understand and improve institutional strategies for addressing achievement, satisfaction, and mental well-being
SSHRC · 2023 · Co-investigator
A Systematic Review of K12 Teachers' Use of Generative AI Tools, a Survey of Canadian Teacher Education Programs' Treatment of the Topic, and the Relationship of Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Pre-service Education and In-service Practice
Principal investigators: Bernard, Robert M.
A Systematic Review of Online Learning and its Variants as Related to Self-Efficacy, Achievement and Attitudes in Pre- and In-service Teacher Education
Principal investigators: Schmid, Richard F.
Keywords: self-efficacy; online learning; blended learning; flipped classrooms; meta-analysis; qualitative synthesis
Social isolation in remote learning contexts among post-secondary students: Using systematic review to understand and improve institutional strategies for addressing achievement, satisfaction, and mental well-being
Principal investigators: Bernard, Robert M.
Keywords: online education; social isolation; social presence; systematic review; post-secondary education
Understanding Drug Exceptional Access Programs (DEAPs) Across Canada: A Question of Equity
Principal investigators: David, Pierre-Marie
Keywords: pharmaceutical policies; health sociology; equity; exception; access; pharmaceuticalization
An Innovative Approach for Supporting Teachers' Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices in Three Large Urban School Boards
Principal investigators: Dion, Eric
Keywords: teachers; instruction: classroom management; evidence-based practices
Social isolation among post-secondary students: A systematic review of online learning and its effect on achievement, satisfaction, and self-reported feelings of well-being
Principal investigators: Bernard, Robert M.
Keywords: social isolation; social presence; online learning; systematic review; knowledge synthesis; post-secondary education
An Innovative Approach for Supporting Teachers' Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices in Three Large Urban School Boards
Principal investigators: Dion, Eric
Keywords: teachers; instruction: classroom management; evidence-based practices
A quantitative and qualitative synthesis of the empirical research examining the role of technology in K12 science education
Principal investigators: Schmid, Richard F.
Keywords: educational technology; K-12 education; technology integration; systematic review; science education
Prospects and problems of implementing blended learning in higher education as viewed through the lens of systematic review and meta-analysis
Principal investigators: Bernard, Robert M.
Keywords: blended learning; online learning; classroom instructions; systematic review; meta-analysis
Gauging the effects of student-centred versus teacher-centred pedagogy in technology-rich distance education, online and blended learning environments: quantitative and qualitative syntheses
Principal investigators: Bernard, Robert M.
Keywords: distance education; on-line learning meta-analysis; on-line teaching; technology integration in education
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.