This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a HEC Montréal directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $135,000
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
NSERC · 2020 · Principal investigator
- $170,000
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
NSERC · 2014 · Principal investigator
- $23,000
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
NSERC · 2013 · Principal investigator
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
Principal investigators: Rémillard, Bruno
Keywords: empirical processes; goodness-of-fit; dependence models; bootstrapping methods; mixed data
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
Principal investigators: Rémillard, Bruno
Statistical tests based on empirical processes
Principal investigators: Remillard, Bruno
MPrime Network (formerly MITACS) / Réseau MPrime (autrefois MITACS)
Principal investigators: Gupta, Arvind
Tests based on empirical processes
Principal investigators: Remillard, Bruno
Grappe de calcul pour l'exploitation de données et l'Ingénierie financiére
Principal investigators: Remillard, Bruno
Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems/Les mathématiques des technologies de l'information et des systèmes complexes
Principal investigators: Gupta, Arvind
Stochastic tools for financial engineering
Principal investigators: Remillard, Bruno
Nouvelle économie financière (e-finance)
Principal investigators: Dionne, Georges
Keywords: nouvelle économie financière; e-finance; e-révolution; marché boursier; bourse électronique; globalisation des marchés; régulation; liquidité; segmentation; volatilité; produit dérivé; banque de données de grande dimension; réseau parallèle d'ordinateurs
Asymptotic behaviour of occupation times and empirical processes
Principal investigators: Remillard, Bruno
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.