This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $348,000
The Evolution of Genetic Systems in Plants
NSERC · 2017 · Principal investigator
- $24,864
Improving biopolymer yield in the feedstock plant Camelina sativa through hybridization
NSERC · 2015 · Principal investigator
- $116,875
Aquatron to study the genomics of adaptation to environmental change
NSERC · 2014 · Co-investigator
1 publications.
Opposing effects of plant traits on diversification.
Anderson B, Pannell J, Billiard S, Burgarella C, de Boer H, Dufay M, Helmstetter AJ, Méndez M, Otto SP, Roze D, Sauquet H, Schoen D, Schönenberger J, Vallejo-Marin M, Zenil-Ferguson R, Käfer J, Glémin S
The Evolution of Genetic Systems in Plants
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
Improving biopolymer yield in the feedstock plant Camelina sativa through hybridization
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
Aquatron to study the genomics of adaptation to environmental change
Principal investigators: Barrett, Rowan
Development of a new tool for the production and breeding of hybrid and synthetic varieties of the Canadian oilseed crop camelina sativa (phase 1 proposal)
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
Population genomic studies of mating system transitions
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
NSERC - CANPOLIN (Canadian Pollination Initiative)
Principal investigators: Kevan, Peter
The evolution of genetic systems
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
Genome evolution in plants
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
PCR machine for research in evolutionary genetics
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
The evolution of self-pollination: genetic and ecological aspects
Principal investigators: Schoen, Daniel
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.