This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $111,021
Books of the Slaves: Black Bibliophiles in Late Colonial and Early Republican Latin America (1750-1850)
SSHRC · 2025 · Principal investigator
- $90,228
Rare treasures: colonial manuscripts, book collectors, and the search for the Latin American past
SSHRC · 2014 · Principal investigator
- $2,297,800
Early modern conversions: religions, cultures, cognitive ecologies
SSHRC · 2012 · Co-investigator
Books of the Slaves: Black Bibliophiles in Late Colonial and Early Republican Latin America (1750-1850)
Principal investigators: Jouve Martin, Jose R
Rare treasures: colonial manuscripts, book collectors, and the search for the Latin American past
Principal investigators: Jouve Martin, Jose R.
Keywords: literature; book collecting; history; cultural colonialism; Latin American studies
Early modern conversions: religions, cultures, cognitive ecologies
Keywords: conversion; religious culture; cognitive ecologies; digital humanities; interdisciplinary cultural history
Death, kingship, and writing in the Spanish Colonial Empire (1560-1886)
Principal investigators: Jouve Martin, Jose R.
Keywords: death in literature; book circulation; European colonialism; imperialism and monarchy; funerary rituals; transatlantic connections
From slaves to scribes: slavery, orality and literacy in Peru 1531-1825
Principal investigators: Jouve Martin, Jose R.
Keywords: orality; literacy; slavery; Afro-Latin American literature; Spanish American colonial literature
The Hispanic Baroque: Complexity in the First Atlantic Culture
Principal investigators: Suárez, Juan Luis
Keywords: baroque; cultural complexity; hispanic world; neobaroque; atlantic rim
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.