This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $18,435
"Pre-Modern Research and the Social Life of Reformist Texts: the Wycliffite Floretum"
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $43,284
"Pre-Modern Research and the Social Life of Reformist Texts: the Wycliffite Floretum"
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $115,831
English encyclopedism and European manuscript culture in the later middle ages
SSHRC · 2016 · Principal investigator
"Pre-Modern Research and the Social Life of Reformist Texts: the Wycliffite Floretum"
Principal investigators: Van Dussen, Michael
Keywords: encyclopedias and florilegia; religious controversy; manuscript studies; pre-modern communication; england and east-central europe; wycliffites; hussites
"Pre-Modern Research and the Social Life of Reformist Texts: the Wycliffite Floretum"
Principal investigators: Van Dussen, Michael
Keywords: encyclopedias and florilegia; religious controversy; manuscript studies; pre-modern communication; england and east-central europe; wycliffites; hussites
English encyclopedism and European manuscript culture in the later middle ages
Principal investigators: Van Dussen, Michael
Keywords: manuscript studies; encyclopedism; book history; communication before print; medieval heresy; medieval religious controversy; general councils; fifteenth century
Collecting and Curiosity before Print: The Idea of the Archive in Fifteenth-Century England
Principal investigators: Van Dussen, Michael
Europe after Wyclif International Conference
Principal investigators: Van Dussen, Michael
Keywords: religious controversy; middle ages; central and Eastern Europe; communication; Wycliffism; hussitism; conciliar movement; fifteenth century
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.