This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $451,350
A novel through-the-scope exchangeable double balloon catheter to guide endoscopic bypass: a practice-changing technology in the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction
CIHR · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $328,950
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) of first intent with a lumen apposing metal stent vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial (ELEMENT trial)
CIHR · 2020 · Co-investigator
A novel through-the-scope exchangeable double balloon catheter to guide endoscopic bypass: a practice-changing technology in the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction
Principal investigators: Chen, Yen-I; Forbes, Nauzer
Keywords: Cancer Obstruction; Endoscopic Bypass; Endoscopic Catheter; Endoscopic Stent Insertion; Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gastroenterostomy; Gastroenterology; Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction; Pancreatic Cancer; Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound; Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) of first intent with a lumen apposing metal stent vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial (ELEMENT trial)
Principal investigators: Chen, Yen-I; Barkun, Alan N
Keywords: Bile Duct Drainage; Gastroenterology; Pancreatic Cancer; Pancreatic Surgery; Randomized Controlled Trial; Stents; Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound; Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.