This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $13,576
Music in Michael Ondaatje's Fiction
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $29,265
Music in Michael Ondaatje's Fiction
SSHRC · 2023 · Principal investigator
- $99,508
Canadian writers and their literary agents, 1890-1990
SSHRC · 2016 · Principal investigator
Music in Michael Ondaatje's Fiction
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: Michael Ondaatje; Canadian literature; Canadian fiction; music; literary history
Music in Michael Ondaatje's Fiction
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: Michael Ondaatje; Canadian literature; Canadian fiction; music; literary history
Canadian writers and their literary agents, 1890-1990
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: Canadian literature; Canadian literary history; book history; material culture; historiography; literary agents; publishing
Nationalism and the canon in English-Canadian literary anthologies
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: anthologies; canons; nationalism; literary history
A history of English-Canadian literary criticism, 1951-2005
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: literary history; literary criticism; canonical theory; literature and economy; arts funding
Where is here now? Contemporary English-Canadian fiction writers and their works
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: Canadian literature; Canadian fiction; literary history; publishing; critical reception
English-Canadian literary anthologies and the representation of nation
Principal investigators: Lecker, Robert
Keywords: anthologies; historiography; canonicity; ideology; pedagogy; citizenship; publishing
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.