This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a McGill University directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Latest funding
- $47,367
Analyzing Beethoven's piano sonatas: a form-functional approach
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $45,611
Analyzing Beethoven's piano sonatas: a form-functional approach
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $84,190
Cadence: a study of closure in tonal music
SSHRC · 2010 · Principal investigator
Analyzing Beethoven's piano sonatas: a form-functional approach
Principal investigators: Caplin, William E.
Keywords: Beethoven; piano sonatas; musical form; analysis; sketches; compositional process
Analyzing Beethoven's piano sonatas: a form-functional approach
Principal investigators: Caplin, William E.
Keywords: Beethoven; piano sonatas; musical form; analysis; sketches; compositional process
Cadence: a study of closure in tonal music
Principal investigators: Caplin, William E.
Keywords: music; cadence; closure; harmony; form; phrase structure; time; baroque; classical; romantic; Bach; Haydn; Mozart; Beethoven; Schubert; Chopin; Schumann; Wagner; Brahms
The dynamics of music listening: an interdisciplinary dialogue between music theory and music psychology
Principal investigators: McAdams, Stephen E.
Keywords: music analysis; musical structure; music cognition; emotional response; musical sound; music recognition
The origins of classical phrase structure
Principal investigators: Caplin, William E.
Keywords: music; composition; form; phrase structure; classical; baroque; harmony; Bach; Scarlatti; Handel; Haydn; Mozart; Beethoven
The legacy of classical form for the romantic generation
Principal investigators: Caplin, William
Keywords: classical;phrase structure;romantic;compositional practice;history of theory
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.