Faculty profile
Maurice Labelle
Back to facultyThis profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC). We have not imported them from a University of Saskatchewan directory, so their publications, courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest funding
- $42,170
CROSS-BORDER INVESTMENTS, FIRM INNOVATIONS, AND COUNTRY/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AMID US-CHINA RIVALRY: CONTEXTS OF VENTURE CAPITAL AND CRITICAL MINERALS
SSHRC · 2025 · Co-investigator
- $8,500
Decolonizing World News: A Collaborative Study of the Non-Aligned News Agencies Pool
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
- $189,391
Decolonizing World News: A Collaborative Study of the Non-Aligned News Agencies Pool
SSHRC · 2021 · Principal investigator
CROSS-BORDER INVESTMENTS, FIRM INNOVATIONS, AND COUNTRY/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AMID US-CHINA RIVALRY: CONTEXTS OF VENTURE CAPITAL AND CRITICAL MINERALS
Principal investigators: Li, Jing
Keywords: Cross-border investments; US-China rivalry; innovation; venture capital; critical mineral; country/community development
Decolonizing World News: A Collaborative Study of the Non-Aligned News Agencies Pool
Principal investigators: Labelle, Maurice Jr. M.
Keywords: world news; decolonization; information; anti-racism; international communications; network analysis; third world; equity; freedom of expression; UNESCO
Decolonizing World News: A Collaborative Study of the Non-Aligned News Agencies Pool
Principal investigators: Labelle, Maurice Jr.
Keywords: world news; decolonization; information; anti-racism; international communications; network analysis; third world; equity; freedom of expression; UNESCO
Islam on the Prairies Conference
Principal investigators: Makarova, Veronika
Keywords: Islamic studies; religious studies; multiculturalism; anti-terrorism; cultural diversity; prevention of racism and discrimination
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.