This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a University of British Columbia directory, so their courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest papers
Using a metaphor of baskets and copper pots to identify "what work, whose work" in truth, rights, responsibilities, and reconciliation in public health.
Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
Latest funding
- $100,000
Chee Ooahut - Qwet Nsayka Tillicum: Co-creating self-collection kits for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection (STBBI) testing with Indigenous communities
CIHR · 2024 · Principal investigator
1 publications.
Using a metaphor of baskets and copper pots to identify "what work, whose work" in truth, rights, responsibilities, and reconciliation in public health.
Behn Smith D, Chenery J, Dove N, Jongbloed K
Chee Ooahut - Qwet Nsayka Tillicum: Co-creating self-collection kits for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection (STBBI) testing with Indigenous communities
Principal investigators: Gilbert, Mark P; Chenery, Jessica C; Porter, Amanda; Sturm, Judy
Keywords: Co-Creation; Implementation Science; Indigenous Self-Determination; Self-Collected Specimen Kits; Sexually Transmitted And Blood Borne Infections
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
Frequent collaborators
- Kate Jongbloed and Kate Jongbloed: 3 shared papers
- Naomi Dove and Kate Jongbloed: 1 shared paper
- Naomi Dove and Jessica Chenery: 1 shared paper
- Naomi Dove and Kate Jongbloed: 1 shared paper
- Kate Jongbloed and Jessica Chenery: 1 shared paper
- Jessica Chenery and Kate Jongbloed: 1 shared paper
- Psychiatry
- Other
Co-authors at University of British Columbia, colored by department. Thicker lines mean more shared papers; select anyone to open their profile and their own map.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.