This profile is built from public research funding records (CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC) and PubMed. We have not imported them from a University of Northern British Columbia directory, so their courses and email address may be missing. Find their university profile.
Research
Latest papers
Seeing but not believing: Insights into the intractability of failure to fail.
Medical education · 2020
Development and Evaluation of Innovative Peer-Led Physical Activity Programs for Mental Health Service Users.
The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2017
Latest funding
- $100,000
H.E.A.R.T. Medicine: Humanities Education, Arts, Anticolonial Reconciling, and Truth-Telling in Medicine
CIHR · 2023 · Principal investigator
2 publications.
Seeing but not believing: Insights into the intractability of failure to fail.
Gingerich A, Sebok-Syer SS, Larstone R, Watling CJ, Lingard L
Development and Evaluation of Innovative Peer-Led Physical Activity Programs for Mental Health Service Users.
Graham CR, Larstone R, Griffiths B, de Leeuw S, Anderson L, Powell-Hellyer S, Long N
H.E.A.R.T. Medicine: Humanities Education, Arts, Anticolonial Reconciling, and Truth-Telling in Medicine
Principal investigators: De Leeuw, Sarah; Blackstock, Sheila Y; Hunt, Sarah; Kuper, Ayelet; Larstone, Roseann M; Neilson, Shane D; Stewart, Wendy A
Keywords: Anti-Colonial Indigenous Informed Research; Arts In Medicine; Health And Medical Pedagogy Research; Health Humanities; Interdisciplinary Research; Medical And Health Education; Medical Education; Systems Transformation Research
From CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC funding decisions: CIHR since 2008, NSERC since 1991 and SSHRC since 1998, including their latest published competition results.
Frequent collaborators
- Sarah De Leeuw and Sarah De Leeuw: 6 shared papers
- Lorelei Lingard and Roseann Larstone: 1 shared paper
- Sarah De Leeuw and Roseann Larstone: 1 shared paper
- Sarah De Leeuw and Roseann Larstone: 1 shared paper
- Medicine
- Other
Co-authors at University of Northern British Columbia, colored by department. Thicker lines mean more shared papers; select anyone to open their profile and their own map.
A short, specific email works best. This draft uses one of their recent papers; replace the parts in brackets with your own details before sending.